... Hall of Fame has bee Troy Aikman.
Even more so his 1st ballot induction, instead of say, 5 years down the road.
Regarded as a winner, the Tom Brady of the 1990s so to speak, there have been viable arguments, but I just don't buy them.
Statistics aren't everything, ask Marino or Fouts, but wins alone cannot be the sole merit for judging a Quarterback.
As my first article on BR argued, the Quarterback position is the most glorified position in the NFL, and unjustly so, it could be the most important, but only by a very small margin, the Quarterback can be better argued as a product of a system 90% of the time, same for pretty much every position in the NFL, but it's how important of a component in that system a player was that shows his true greatness.
I believe Aikman was not true greatness.
The following slides will showcase the ten Quarterbacks I would replace Aikman with, they are based on how many years they have been eligible, their statistics, success in wining, league...
Read Complete Article at Bleacher Report - NFL
Article Source: BleacherReport.com